Thursday, August 1, 2019

Candace Bushnell is Always Bad for Women

Like most heterosexual men, we've never seen Candace Bushnell's Sex and the City, though we admit we kind dig the idea of a bunch of babes sitting at a table in a fancy NYC restaurant, talking about sex. With a tweak or two we think we could make this work.

[I'm not sure I want to understand what you're talking about-Ed]

A decade or so removed from the show Bushnell says:
Her best-selling book and the racy TV series it inspired taught a generation of women that they could ‘have it all’. But Sex and the City creator Candace Bushnell, 60, has admitted that she regrets choosing a career over having children as she is now ‘truly alone’. ...The former sex columnist, who is worth around £18million, told the Sunday Times: ‘When I was in my thirties and forties, I didn’t think about it. ‘Then when I got divorced and I was in my fifties, I started to see the impact of not having children and of truly being alone. I do see that people with children have an anchor in a way that people who have no kids don’t.’
The spinster Bushnell has a few regrets.

We kind of know how she feels, actually.

We're alone this week, and we find ourselves bored, directionless and terrified by this empty house. That's Ms., with emphasis on the prefix, Bushnell's present and future.

One other thing, after a hit TV series and several bestselling books Bushnell is only worth 18 million Pounds? She should fire her agent. At least with the 18 mil Bushnell won't die alone in an efficiency full of cats. She'll have top notch, round the clock nursing care.

Remember, feminism is always bad for women.

No comments:

Post a Comment